Psychosocial and Moral Factors of Bystanders in Peer Bullying
Keywords:
peer bullying, bystander roles, classroom norms, moral disengagement, social goals, peer support, studentsAbstract
The aim of our study was to explore students’ bystander roles in peer bullying considering the interaction between their individual and contextual characteristics. We included social status goals (popularity, social preference and social insecurity), moral disengagement and peer support as key variables for differentiating bystander behaviour. Our sample comprised 5148 students from the 8th and 9th grades across 118 primary schools in Slovenia. Bystander roles (active and passive reinforcers, ignorants and defenders) were determined by peer nominations. Other characteristics were measured with self-report questionnaires. For each variable, we normalized students’ results with regard to their classroom to define classroom norms as the context of peer bullying resulting in “low”, “average” and “high” group. Students with similar individual and contextual characteristics were grouped into four clusters. The results showed that students from all clusters were present in all bystander roles, which indicates a highly complex interaction of various factors in bystander behaviour. Some educational implications are discussed.
Downloads
References
Alcantara, S. C., González-Carrasco, M., Montserrat, C., Viñas, F., Casas, F., & Abreu, D. P. (2017). Peer violence in the school environment and its relationship with subjective well-being and perceived social support among children and adolescents in Northeastern Brazil. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18, 1507–1532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9786-1
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724022014322
Bouman, T., van der Meulen, M., Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., Vermande, M. M., & Aleva, E. A. (2012). Peer and self-reports of victimiza¬tion and bullying: Their differential association with internalizing problems and social adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 50(6), 759–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.08.004
Bradshaw, C. P., Sawyer, A. L., & O’Brennan, L. M. (2007). Bullying and peer victimization at school: Perceptual differences between students and school staff. School Psychology Review, 36, 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2007.12087929
Bronfenbrenner U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Chander, S., & Vijaya, P. (2021). Unsupervised learning methods for data clustering. In Artificial Intelligence in Data Mining (pp. 41-64). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820601-0.00002-1
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Children Development, 75(1), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x
Cillessen, A. H., Mayeux, L., Ha, T., de Bruyn, E. H., & LaFontana, K. M. (2014). Aggressive effects of prioritizing popularity in early adolescence. Aggressive behavior, 40(3), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21518
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Marks, P. E. L. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring popularity. In A. H. N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz, & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 25–56). Guilford Press.
Espelage D. L., Rao, M. A, & De La Rue, L. (2013). Current reseach on school-based bullying: A social-ecological perspective. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 22(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1179/1053078913Z.0000000002
Ewans, C. B., & Smokowski, P. R. (2015). Prosocial bystander behavior in bullying dynamics: Assessing the impact of social capital. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12), 2289–2307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0338-5
Garandeau, C. F., & Lansu, T. A. (2019). Why does decreased likeability not deter adolescent bullying perpetrators?. Aggressive behavior, 45(3), 348–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21824
Garandeau, C. F., Vermande, M. M., Reijntjes, A. H. A., & Aarts, E. (2022). Classroom bullying norms and peer status: Effects on victim-oriented and bully-oriented defending. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(5), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419894722
Hlebec, V., & Kogovšek, T. (2003). Konceptualizacija socialne opore. Družboslovne razprave, 19(43), 103–125.
Holt, M. K., & Espelage, D. L. (2007). Perceived social support among bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 984–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9153-3
Jenkins, L. N., & Tennant, J. (2022). Social‑Emotional Skill‑based Differences Between Active and Passive Bystanders of Bullying. Contemporary School Psychology, 27, 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-022-00407-7
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Anderson, D. (1983). Social interdependence and classroom climate. The Journal of Psychology, 114(1), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1983.9915406
Kiefer, S. M., Alley, K. M., & Ellerbrock, C. R. (2015). Teacher and Peer Support for Young Adolescents’ Motivation, Engagement, and School Belonging. Research in middle level education, 38(8), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2015.11641184
Killer, B., Bussey, K., Hawes, D., & Hunt, C. (2019). A meta‐analysis of the relationship between moral disengagement and bullying roles in youth. Aggressive Behavior, 45(4), 450–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21833
Koračin, T., Košir, K., & Špes, T. (2023, in press). Socialni cilji kot dejavnik razlik v izvajanju medvrstniškega nasilja. In K. Košir, & T. Špes (Eds.). Celostni pristop k medvrstniškemu nasilju: psihosocialni konteksti in raziskovalne strategije. Univerzitetna založba Univerze v Mariboru.
Košir, K., Klasinc, L, Pivec, T., Špes, T., Cankar, G., & Horvat, M. (2020). Predictors of self-reported and peer-reported victimization and bullying behavior in early adolescents: The role of classroom and individual factors. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35, 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00430-y
Košir, K., Zorjan, S., Mikl, A., & Horvat, M. (2021). Social goals and bullying: Examinning the moderating role of self-perceived popularity, scial status insecurity and classroom variability in popularity. Social Development, 31(2), 438-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12547
Košir, K. (2023, in press). Psihosocialne značilnosti razredov in medvrstniško nasilje. In K. Košir, & T. Špes. (Eds.), Celostni pristop k medvrstniškemu nasilju: psihosocialni konteksti in raziskovalne strategije. Univerzitetna založba Univerze v Mariboru.
Lambe, L. J., Hudson, C. C., Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. J. (2017). Does defending come with a cost? Examining the psychosocial correlates of defending behavior among bystanders of bullying in a Canadian sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 65, 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.01.012
Lambe, L. J., Della Cioppa, V., Hong, I. K., & Craig, W.M. (2019). Standing up to bullying: A social ecological review of peer defending in offline and online contexts. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.007
Li, Y., & Wright, M. F. (2014).Adolescents’ social status goals: Relationships to social status insecurity, aggression, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(1), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9939-z
Long, Y., & Li, Y. (2019). The longitudinal association between social status insecurity and relational aggression: Moderation effects of social cognition about relational aggression. Aggressive behavior, 46(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ab.21872
Lucas-Molina, B., Giménez-Dasí, M., Fonseca-Pedrero, E., & Pérez-Albéniz, A. (2018). What makes a defender? A multilevel study of individual correlates and classroom norms in explaining defending behavior. School Psychology Review, 47(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0011.V47-1
Markovič, R., Gosak, M., Grubelnik, V., Marhl, M., & Virtič, P. (2019). Data-driven classification of residential energy consumption patterns by means of functional connectivity networks. Applied energy, 242, 506-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.134
Obermann, M. L. (2011). Moral disengagement among bystanders to school bullying. Journal of School Violence, 10(3), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2011.578276
Oh I., & Hazler R. J. (2009) Contributions of personal and situational factors to bystanders’ reactions to school bullying. School Psychology International 30(3), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034309106499
Pečjak, S., Pirc, T., & Košir, K. (2021). Medvrstniško nasilje v šoli. Ljubljana: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani.
Pergolizzi, F., Richmond, D., Macario, S., Gan, Z., Richmond, C., & Macario, E. (2009). Bullying in Middle Schools: Results from a Four-School Survey. Journal of School Violence, 8(3), 264–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220902910839
Pouwels, J. L., Lansu, T. A. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2018). A developmental perspective on popularity and the group process of bullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 43, 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.10.003
Pouwels J. L., van Noorden T. H. J., & Caravita S. C. S. (2019). Defending victims of bullying in the classroom: The role of moral responsibility and social costs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, Article 103831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103831
Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2010). Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: The role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,38(6), 815–827. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10802- 010- 9399-9
Pozzoli, T., Ang, R. P., & Ang, R. (2012). Bystanders’ reactions to bullying: A cross-cultural analysis of personal correlates among Italian and Singaporean students. Social Development, 21(4), 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00651.x
Pronk, J., Olthof, T., Aleva, E. A., van der Meulen, M., Vermande, M. M., & Goossens, F. A. (2020). Longitudinal associations between adolescents’ bullying-related indirect defending, outsider behavior, and peer-group status. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 30, 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12450
Rest, J. R. (1983). Morality. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.). Manual of child psychology (pp. 495–555). (4thEdition, Vol. 3). New York: Wiley.
Sainio, M., Veenstra, R., Huitsing, G., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). Victims and their defenders: A dyadic approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(2), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410378068
Salmivalli, C., Huttunen, A., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1997). Peer networks and bullying in schools. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 38(4), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00040
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007
Salmivalli C., & Voeten M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behavior in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(3), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000488
Salmivalli C., Voeten M., & Poskiparta E. (2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40(5), 668–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.597090
Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Empirical test of bullies' status goals: Assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 35(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20282
Sijtsema, J. J., Lindenberg, S. M., Ojanen, T. J. in Salmivalli, C. (2020). Direct aggression and the balance between status and affection goals in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49, 1481–1491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01166-0
Smith, P. K. (2014). Understanding school bullying: Its nature and prevention strategies. SAGE Publications.
Thornberg R., Pozzoli T., Gini G., & Jungert T. (2015). Unique and interactive effects of moral emotions and moral disengagement on bullying and defending among school children. Elementary School Journal, 116(2), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/683985
Thornberg, R., & Jungert, T. (2013). Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescence, 36(3), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003
Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., Pozzoli, T., & Hong, J. S. (2019). Moral disengagement and school bullying perpetration in middle childhood: A short-term longitudinal study in Sweden. Journal of School Violence, 18, 585–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2019.1636383
Thornberg, R., Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2022). Defending or Remaining Passive as a Bystander of School Bullying in Sweden: The Role of Moral Disengagement and Antibullying Class Norms. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(19-20), NP18666-NP18689. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211037427
Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of applied school psychology, 19(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1300/J008v19n02_10
van der Ploeg, R., Kretschmer, T., & Salmivalli, C. (2017). Defending victims: What does it take to intervene in bullying and how is it rewarded by peers? Journal of School Psychology, 65, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.06.002
Vaux, A. (1988). Social Support: Theory, Research, and Intervention. New York: Praeger.
Veenstra R., Dijkstra J. K., & Kreager D. A. (2018). Pathways, networks, and norms: A sociological perspective on peer research. In W. M.Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd ed., pp. 45-63). Guilford Press.
Volk, A. A., Veenstra, R., & Espelage, D. L. (2017). So you want to study bullying? Recommendations to enhance the validity, transparency, and comparability of bullying research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 36(3), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.07.003
Waasdorp, T. E., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2018). Examining Variation in Adolescent Bystanders' Responses to Bullying, School Psychology Review, 47(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0081.V47-1
Wright, M. F., LI, Y., & Shi, J. (2012). Chinese Adolescents' Social Status Goals: Associations with Behaviors and Attributions for Relational Aggression. Youth Society, 46(4), 566–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X12448800
Yang, L., & Gao, T. (2022). Defending or not? The role of peer status, social self‑efficacy, and moral disengagement on Chinese adolescents’ bystander behaviors in bullying situations. Current Psychology, 42(33), 29616–29627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04039-1
Zhang, Y., Lan, X., Cui, G., & Wang, J. (2022). The Silver Lining in the Dark Cloud of Social Status Insecurity: The Mediating Role of Popularity Goals in the Association Between Social Status Insecurity and Chinese Adolescents’ Bullying Bystander Behaviors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(17-18), 15851–15873. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211023489
