Explanations of prospective middle school mathematics teachers for potential misconceptions on the concept of symmetry

Main Article Content

Mihriban Hacisalihoğlu Karadeniz Tuğba Baran Kaya Figen Bozkuş


This study is an explanatory study, which follows a qualitative methodology and aims to reveal the explanations of prospective mathematics teachers for the potential misconceptions of secondary school students in relation to the concept of symmetry and the correction of such misconceptions. The study group consisted of a total of 26 prospective middle school mathematics teachers, who were senior students. The data of the study were obtained from the open-ended test prepared by the researchers. Following the data analysis, it was found out that the majority of the participants failed to identify the mistakes of students and suggested the ways to “letter the corners of the shape and measure the distance based on the axis of symmetry” in order to correct these mistakes. Moreover, the study notably observed that the participants adopted practical solutions such as the use of a mirror, paper folding, and the use of unit squares more in teaching the concept of symmetry. It may be stated that the prospective teachers, in this way, overlooked the development of conceptual knowledge in students.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
HACISALIHOĞLU KARADENIZ, Mihriban; BARAN KAYA, Tuğba; BOZKUŞ, Figen. Explanations of prospective middle school mathematics teachers for potential misconceptions on the concept of symmetry. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 1, p. 71-82, oct. 2017. ISSN 1307-9298. Available at: <http://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/300>. Date accessed: 20 oct. 2017.


Aksoy, Y., & Bayazit, İ. (2010). Examination of the difficulties encountered in learning and teaching the concepts of symmetry in an analytical approach. In E. Bingölbali, M.F. Özmantar, Mathematical difficulties and solution proposals encountered in primary (pp. 187-215). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
Aydın Güç, F., & Hacısalihoğlu Karadeniz, M. (2016). Examining the Mental Addition Strategies That Are Used by The Secondary School Students. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 17(3).
Baki, A., (1997). Educating mathematics teachers, Medical Journal of Islamic Academy of Sciences, 10(3)
Baki, A., & Kartal, T. (2004). Characterization of high school students’algebra information in the context of conceptional and operational knowledge.Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 27-50. Doi: http://www.tebd.gazi.edu.tr/index.php/tebd/article/view/198
Baki, A. (2006). Kuramdan uygulamaya matematik eğitimi[Mathematics education from theory to practice]. Trabzon: Derya Kitabevi.
Ball, D. L. (1991). Implementing the Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics: What's All This Talk about Discourse?. Arithmetic Teacher, 39(3), 44-48. Bekdemir, M., Okur, M., & Gelen, S. (2010). The effects of 2005 elementary mathematıcs educatıon currıculum on the elementary seventh grade students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge and skılls. Journal of Erzincan University Education Faculty, 12(2).
Berg, T., & Brouwer, W. (1991). Teacher Awareness of Student Alternate Conceptions about Rotational Motion and Gravity. Journal of Research in science teaching, 28(1), 3-18.
Bintaş, J., Altun, M., & Arslan, K. (2003). Teaching symmetry with realistic mathematics education. MATDER, retrieved from http://www.matder.org.tr/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=57:simetri-ogretimi&catid=8:matematik-kosesi-makaleleri&Itemid=172 Birgin, O., & Gürbüz, R. (2009). Investigation of primary school students’ operational and conceptual knowledge level about the rational numbers. Journal of Uludağ University Education Faculty, 22(2), 529-550. doi: http://www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423935447.pdf
Case, M.J., & Fraser, D.M. (1999). An İnvestigation İnto Chemical Engineering Students’ Understanding of The Mole and The Use of Concrete Activities to Promote Conceptual Change, International Journal of Science Education, 21(12), 1237-1249.
Desmond, N. S. (1997). The geometric Content Knowledge of Prospective Elementary Teachers, Dissertation.1997. 233 f. Dissertation (Doctor of Philosophy) – The Faculty of the Graduate School of University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Gürbüz, K., & Durmuş, S. (2009). The qualification levels of in-service elementary school teachers on the sub-learning strands, namely transformatıonal geometry, geometrıc objects, pattern and tessellations. Journal of Abant İzzet Baysal University Education Faculty, 9(1). doi: http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/aibuefd/article/viewFile/5000091410/5000084782 Hacısalihoğlu Karadeniz, M., Baran, T., Bozkuş, F., & Gündüz, N. (2015). Difficulties of Prospective Elementary Mathematics Teachers' Regarding to Reflection Symmetry. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 6(1), 117-138. Hacısalihoğlu Karadeniz, M. (2017). Mathematics Teaching via Paper Folding Method. Elementary Education Online, 16(2), 663-692.
Hoyles, C., & Healy, L. (1997). Unfolding Meanings For Reflective Symmetry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 2(1), 27-59. Kaplan, A., & Öztürk, M. (2014). Analysis of 2nd-8th Grade Students’ Thinking Approaches Toward Understand the Concept of Symmetry. Elementary Education Online, 13(4), 1502-1515.doi: http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/ilkonline/article/viewFile/5000075294/5000070250
Karadağ, E. (2010). Research Models Used in Doctoral Dissertations in the Area of Education Sciences in Turkey: Quality of Research and Analytical Errors. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 49-71 .Köse, N. Y., & Özdaş, A. (2009). How Do The Fifth Grade Primary School Students Determine The Line of Symmetry in Various Geometrical Shapes Using Cabri Geometry Software?. Elementary Education Online, 8(1), 159-175. Retrieved from http://ilkogretim- online.org.tr/vol8say1/v8s1m13.pdf?origin=publication_detail
Köse, N. Y. (2012). Primary School Students' Knowledge of Line Symmetry. Hacettepe Unıversıtesı Egıtım Fakultesı Dergısı, 42, 274-286.
Küchemann D. (1981). Reflection and Rotation. In K. Hart, Children’s understanding of mathematics (pp. 137-157). London: John Murray Küçük, A., & Demir, B. (2009). A Study on Some Misperceived Concepts in the Teaching of Mathematics in 6th-8th Grades. Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gokalp Education Faculty, 13.
Leikin, R., Berman, A., & Zaslavsky, O. (1998). Definition of Symmetry. Symmetry: Culture and Science: Order and Disorder, 9(2-4), 375-382.
Leikin, R., Berman, A., & Zaslavsky, O. (2000). Applications of Symmetry to Problem solving. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(6), 799-809.
MEB. (2013). Middle School Mathematics Education Program. Retrieved from http://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/program2.aspx?islem=1&kno=215 Oliver, A. (1989). Handling Pupils’ Misconceptions. Presidential Address Delivered at the Thirteenth National Convention on Mathematics,.Physical Science and Biology Education, Pretoria,;1; 3-7 July 1989. [http://academic.sun.ac.za/mathed/Malati/Misconceptions.htm].
Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of nursing scholarship, 33(1), 93-96.
Orton, J. (1999). Children’s perception of pattern in relation to shape. In A. Orton, Pattern in the teaching and learning of maths. London: Cassell, 149-167.
Seidel, J. (1998). Symmetry in season. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4, 244-246.
Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and teacher Education, 5(1), 1-20. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0742051X89900152
Smith, J.P., diSessa, A.A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2): 115-163. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1466679?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Son, J. W. (2006). Investigating preservice teachers’understanding and strategies on a student’s errors of reflective symmetry. Proceedings of the 30th of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 5, 146-155. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED496939.pdf#page=153 Son, J. W., & Sinclair, N. (2010). How preservice teachers interpret and respond to student geometric errors. School Science and Mathematics, 110(1), 31-46. Swan, M. (2001). Dealing with misconceptions in mathematics. In P. Gates, Issues in mathematics teaching (pp. 147-65). London: Routledge Falmer
Turgut, M., Yenilmez, K., & Anapa, P. (2014). Symmetry and rotation skills of prospective elementary mathematics teachers. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 28(48), 383-402.
Yenilmez, K., & Yaşa, E. (2008). Misconceptions of elementary school students in geometry. Journal of Uludağ University Education Faculty, 21(2), 461-483.
Zaslavsky, O. (1994). Tracing students’ misconceptions back to their teacher: A case of symmetry. Pythagoras, 33, 10-17.
Zembat, İ. Ö. (2007). The main tenets of direct ınstruction and constructivism: the case of translations. Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 27(1). doi: http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/gefad/article/view/5000078650/5000072871 Zembat, I. O. (2010). Prospective elementary teachers’ conceptions of volume. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2111-2115.
Weyl, H. (1952). Symmetry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.