Published
December 29, 2019
| Pages: 157-165 | Views: 2347
Abstract
Abstract
This article discusses the impact of online games on children’s lives by violence imposing and manipulation. Online gaming features are highlighted and statistic data are presented based on surveys of Russian teenagers who have been victims of online violence. The research goals are to study reasons for cybervictimization and psychological factors to suggest measures for intervention and prevention violence in the Internet. The subject of research is the role online games play in teenagers’ violence development.
Methods used are resources analysis, questionnaires and survey, acceptance of self and others scale (W. Fey) and Buss-Durkee inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. The survey was conducted among 273 young boys and girls aged 14 to 20 years old (schoolchildren and freshmen), equally covering all age categories of both sexes examining teenagers behavior in the virtual space and network communication features.
Based on the analysis of resources several principles for intervention, prevention programs development, cybervictimization combating were identified.
According to the results of our study, we can conclude that cybervictimization in online games is a really urgent problem, because today’s teenagers and adolescents cannot survive without gadgets, so they are vulnerable to online threats, intimidation, manipulation and other kinds of aggression.
Listen -
References
Andreeva, A.O. (2015) Internet manipulation. Манипулирование в сети Интернет. Информационная безопасность и вопросы профилактики киберэкстремизма среди молодежи. – 21-28.
Aubert, J-L. (2001) La violence dans les ecoles. Paris: Odile Jacob. 208 p.
Baranov, A.A., Rozhina, S.V., (2015) Psychological analysis of the causes of adolescent cyberbullying. Психологический анализ причин подросткового кибербуллинга Вестник удмуртского университета − № 3. – 5-8.
Bastiaensens, S., Vandebosch, H., Poels, K., Van Cleemput, K., DeSmet, A., De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2014) Cyberbullying on social network sites. An experimental study into bystanders’ behavioural intentions to help the victim or reinforce the bully. Computers in Human Behavior. – 31(1). – 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.036
Berezina, O.S. (2015) Social prevention of cyberbullying among teenagers. Социальная профилактика кибербуллинга среди подростков. Информационная безопасность и вопросы профилактики киберэкстремизма среди молодежи. – 63-67.
Brush, S. R.G. (2014) Cyberbullying: Characteristics, administrators' responsibilities, and effective communication strategies. United States: Ann Arbor. 122 p.
Buss, A. H. & Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 343-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0046900
Catalina, B., Lopez-de-Ayala, M.C., & Garcia, A. (2014) Los riesgos de los adolescentes en Internet: los menores como actores y victimas de los peligros de Internet. Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, 69, 462-485. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2014-1020
Cherkasenko, O.S. (2015) The phenomenon of cyberbullying in adolescence. Феномен кибербуллинга в подростковом возрасте. Личность, семья и общество: вопросы педагогики и психологии. − № 6. – 52-54.
Cherkasenko, O.S. (2015) Social network as a kind of social communication. Социальная сеть как разновидность социальной коммуникации. Материалы 36 международной конференции: Вопросы педагогики и психологии, − №3. – p. 141.
Chisholm, J.F. (2014) Review of the status of cyberbullying and cyberbullying prevention. Journal of Information Systems and Education. 25(1). 77–87.
Compton, L., Campbell, M.A., Mergler, A. (2014) Teacher, parent and student perceptions of the motives of cyberbullies. Social Psychology of Education. Vol. 17. 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9254-x
Fedunina N.Y. (2015) Representations of the triad "The pursuer - the victim - the observer" in cyberbullying in English literature. Psychological studies. 8(41). p.11.
Fey, W.F. (1954) Acceptance of self and others, and its relation to therapy readiness. Journal of Clinical Psychology. Vol.10. Issue 3. 269-271. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(195407)10:3<269::AID-JCLP2270100318>3.0.CO;2-E
Hester, W.P. (2012) Cyberbullying intervention: A case study analysis of stakeholder perceptions regarding the authority of school administrators in addressing cyberbullying issues. Dissertation. United States: Ann Arbor. – 156 p.
Howlett-Brandon, M. (2009) Cyberbullying: an examination of gender, race, ethnicity, and environmental factors from the national crime victimization survey, student crime supplement. Dissertation. Virginia Commonwealth University. –108 p.
Khvan, A.A., Zaitsev, Y.A., Kuznetsova, Y.A. (2006) A standardized questionnaire for measuring aggressive and hostile reactions of A. Bass and A. Darki. Стандартизированный опросник измерения агрессивных и враждебных реакций А. Басса и А. Дарки. Методические рекомендации. — Кемерово. - 66.
König, A., Gollwitzer, M., Steffgen, G. (2010) Cyberbullying as an act of revenge? Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20(2), 210–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.20.2.210
Kowalski, R.M., Giumetti, G.W., Schroeder, A.N., Lattanner, M.R. (2014) Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 140. 1073–1137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
Makarova, E.A., Makarova, E.L., Mahrina, E.A., Psychological features of cyberbullying as a form of internet crime. Психологические особенности кибербуллинга как формы интернет- преступления. Российский психологический журнал. М. «Кредо». 13(3). 293-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2016.3.17
Runions, K.C. (2013) Toward a Conceptual Model of Motive and Self-Control in Cyber-Aggression: Rage, Revenge, Reward, and Recreation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 42(5). 751–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9936-2
Van Ingen, B.G. (2014) Investigating Entity Theory as a Mediator Between Peer Victimization and Cyberbullying. Dissertation. United States: Ann Arbor. – 151 p.
Vandebosch, H., Van Cleemput, K. (2009) Cyberbullying among youngsters: profiles of bullies and victims. New Media and Society, 11(8), 1349–1371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809341263
Whittaker E., Kowalski R.M. (2015) Cyberbullying Via Social Media. Journal of School Violence. 14(1). 11–29. https: //doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.949377
Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K. J., Wolak, J., and Finkelhor, D. (2006). Examining characteristics and associated distress related to Internet harassment: Findings from the Second Youth Internet Safety Survey. Pediatrics, 118(4), 1169-1177. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-0815
Ybarra, M., Mitchell, K., Finkelhor, D., and Wolak, J. (2007). Internet prevention messages: Targeting the right online behaviors. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161: 138-145. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.161.2.138
Keywords
Cybervictimization, On-line Games, Violence, Manipulation, Agression
Affiliations
Elena Aleksandrovna Makarova
Don State Technical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
Elena Lvovna Makarova
Southern Federal University, Taganrog, Russian Federation
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
Makarova, E. A., & Makarova, E. L. (2019). Aggressive Behavior in Online Games and Cybervictimization of Teenagers and Adolescents. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12(2), 157–165. Retrieved from https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/856
Author Biography
Elena Aleksandrovna Makarova
The Humanities Faculty, Department of Scientific-Technical Translation and Professional Communication
Professor
Elena Lvovna Makarova
Institute of Management in Economical, Ecological and Social Systems Management and Innovative Technologies Department
Associate Professor
