Development of Self-Concept in Multi-Grade 3rd and 4th Classes

References

1. Anderson, R. H., & Pavan, B. N. (1993). Nongradedness: Helping it to happen. Order Department, Technomic Publishing Company, Inc., 851 New Holland Avenue, Box 3535, Lancaster, PA 17604.
2. Bandura, A., & Wessels, S. (1994). Self-efficacy (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). na.
3. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823.
4. Beutel, S. I., & Hinz, R. (2008). Schulanfang im Wandel: Selbstkonzepte der Kinder als pädagogische Aufgabe (Vol. 6). LIT Verlag Münster.
5. Bliese, P., & Bliese, M. P. (2016). Package ‘multilevel’. R version, 2.
6. Bortz, J., Lienert, G. A., & Boehnke, K. (2008). Verteilungsfreie methoden in der biostatistik. Springer-Verlag.
7. Byrne, B. M., & Gavin, D. A. (1996). The Shavelson Model revisited: Testing for the structure of academic self-concept across pre-, early, and late adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 215.
8. Carle, U., & Metzen, H. (2014). Wie wirkt Jahrgangsübergreifendes Lernen? Internationale Literaturübersicht zum Stand der Forschung, der praktischen Expertise und der pädagogischen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Grundschulverband e.V.
9. Coelho, V. A., Marchante, M., & Jimerson, S. R. (2017). Promoting a positive middle school transition: A randomized-controlled treatment study examining self-concept and self-esteem. Journal of youth and adolescence, 46(3), 558-569.
10. Cohen, J. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer. In Psychological bulletin.
11. Author (2017).
12. Ehm, J. H., Hasselhorn, M., & Schmiedek, F. (2019). Analyzing the developmental relation of academic self-concept and achievement in elementary school children: Alternative models point to different results. Developmental Psychology, 55(11), 2336.
13. Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford press.
14. Ertl, S., Kücherer, B., & Hartinger, A. (2022). Lernentwicklungsgespräche und die Entwicklung motivationaler Aspekte des Lernens. Zeitschrift für Grundschulforschung, 15(1), 221-236.
15. Author (2022).
16. Feinman, S., Roberts, D., Hsieh, K. F., Sawyer, D., & Swanson, D. (1992). A critical review of social referencing in infancy. Social referencing and the social construction of reality in infancy, 15-54.Felson 1993
17. Felson, R. B. (1993). The (somewhat) social self: How others affect self-appraisals. Psychological perspectives on the self, 4, 1-26.
18. Ford, B. E. (1977). Multiage grouping in the elementary school and children's affective development: A review of recent research. The Elementary School Journal, 78(2), 149-159.
19. Gaspard, H., Wigfield, A., Jiang, Y., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., & Marsh, H. W. (2018). Dimensional comparisons: How academic track students’ achievements are related to their expectancy and value beliefs across multiple domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 52, 1-14.
20. Guay, F., Marsh, H. W., & Boivin, M. (2003). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering. Journal of educational psychology, 95(1), 124.
21. Gutierrez, R., & Slavin, R. E. (1992). Achievement effects of the nongraded elementary school: A best evidence synthesis. Review of educational research, 62(4), 333-376.
22. Hahn, E. (2019). Umgang mit Heterogenität an Gemeinschaftsschulen: eine multimethodische Untersuchung zu Oberflächen-und Tiefenstrukturen des Unterrichts (Vol. 6). Waxmann Verlag.
23. Harter, S. (1990). Issues in the assessment of the self-concept of children and adolescents.
24. Hartinger, A., Graumann, O., & Grittner, F. (2004). " Grundschul-Numerus Clausus" oder Orientierungsstufe? Auswirkungen verschiedener Übertrittsbedingungen auf Motivationsstile und Leistungsängstlichkeit von Grundschulkindern.
25. Haußer, K. (1995). Identitätspsychologie. Springer-Verlag.
26. Helmke, A. (1998). Vom Optimisten zum Realisten? Zur Entwicklung des Fähigkeitskonzeptes vom Kindergarten bis zur 6. Klassenstufe. In Entwicklung im Kindesalter (pp. 115-132). Psychologie Verlags Union.
27. Hilbert, A., Petroff, D., Herpertz, S., Pietrowsky, R., Tuschen-Caffier, B., Vocks, S., & Schmidt, R. (2019). Meta-analysis of the efficacy of psychological and medical treatments for binge-eating disorder. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 87(1), 91.
28. Ho, D., Imai, K., King, G., Stuart, E., & Whitworth, A. (2018). Package ‘MatchIt’.
29. Huber, C., Gebhardt, M., & Schwab, S. (2015). Lehrkraftfeedback oder Spaß beim Spiel? Eine Experimentalstudie zum Einfluss von Lehrkraftfeedback auf die soziale Akzeptanz bei Grundschulkindern. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 62(1), 51-64.
30. Huguet, P., Dumas, F., Marsh, H., Régner, I., Wheeler, L., Suls, J., ... & Nezlek, J. (2009). Clarifying the role of social comparison in the big-fish–little-pond effect (BFLPE): An integrative study. Journal of personality and social psychology, 97(1), 156.
31. Jaureguizar, J., Garaigordobil, M., & Bernaras, E. (2018). Self-concept, social skills, and resilience as moderators of the relationship between stress and childhood depression. School mental health, 10(4), 488-499.
32. Jungae Park, K. (1996): The impact of the nongraded program on students’ affective domains and cognitive domains. Ed. D. Dissertation: ProQuest.
33. Author (2003).
34. Author (2006).
35. Köller, O. (2004). Konsequenzen von Leistungsgruppierungen. Waxmann.
36. Kuss, O., Blettner, M., & Börgermann, J. (2016). Propensity Score: An Alternative Method of Analyzing Treatment Effects: Part 23 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 113(35-36), 597.
37. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. (2017). lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of statistical software, 82, 1-26.
38. Laging, R. (2010). Altersheterogenität und Helfen–eine Untersuchung in der Schuleingangsstufe der Reformschule Kassel. Altersgemischtes Lernen in der Schule, 54-71.
39. Lankes, E. M., Rieger, E., & Pook, M. (2015). VERA-3 in Bayern. Ein Instrument für die Schul- und Unterrichtsentwicklung. https://www.isb.bayern.de/download/16050/vera_3_in_bayern.pdf.
40. Madley-Dowd, P., Hughes, R., Tilling, K., & Heron, J. (2019). The proportion of missing data should not be used to guide decisions on multiple imputation. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 110, 63-73.
41. Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American educational research journal, 23(1), 129-149.
42. Marsh, H. W. (1992). Content specificity of relations between academic achievement and academic self-concept. Journal of educational psychology, 84(1), 35.
43. Marsh, H. W. (2009). This MS is the final prepublication (open access) version of the published article: Marsh, HW, & O’Mara, A.(2010). Long-term total negative effects of school-average ability on diverse. Educational Psychology, 24, 51-72.
44. Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1988). A multifaceted academic self-concept: Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 80(3), 366.
45. Author (2006).
46. Miller, B. A. (1991). A Review of the Qualitative Research on Multigrade Instruction.
47. Möller, J. & Trautwein, U. (2015). Selbstkonzept. In Pädagogische Psychologie (pp. 178-199). Berlin, Heidelberg.
48. Möller, J., & Trautwein, U. (2020). Selbstkonzept. In Pädagogische Psychologie (pp. 187-209). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
49. Moschner, B. & Dickhäuser, O. (2018). Selbstkonzept. D. H. Rost, J. R. Sparfeldt & S. R. Buch (Hrsg.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (5. Aufl., S. 750-756). Beltz.
50. Muijs, R. D. (1997). Predictors of academic achievement and academic self‐concept: A longitudinal perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(3), 263-277.
51. MuMIn, B. K. (2020). Multi-model inference. R package version 1.43. 17. 2020.
52. Authors (2021).
53. Pavan, B. N. (1992). The Benefits of Nongraded Schools. Educational leadership, 50(2), 22-25.
54. Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., & Sarkar, D. (2021). R Core Team (2021). nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-152.
55. Pistioli, E. (2018). The Self-Concept in Specific Areas of Students attending Multigrade and Single Grade Elementary Schools: Comparative Approach. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(12), 116-134.
56. Poloczek, S., Karst, K., Praetorius, A. K., & Lipowsky, F. (2011). Generalisten oder Spezialisten? Bereichsspezifität und leistungsbezogene Zusammenhänge des schulischen Selbstkonzepts von Schulanfängern 1Dieser Beitrag wurde unter der geschäftsführenden Herausgeberschaft von Jens Möller angenommen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie.
57. Praetorius, A. K., Kastens, C., Hartig, J., & Lipowsky, F. (2016). Haben Schüler mit optimistischen Selbsteinschätzungen die Nase vorn?. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und pädagogische Psychologie.
58. Quail, A., & Smyth, E. (2014). Multigrade teaching and age composition of the class: The influence on academic and social outcomes among students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 80-90.
59. Authors (2011).
60. Renner, G., Martschinke, S., Munser-Kiefer, M., & Steinmüller, S. (2011). 14 Diagnose und Förderung des Selbstkonzepts im Anfangsunterricht. Selbstkonzepte im Grundschulalter: Modelle, empirische Ergebnisse, pädagogische Konsequenzen, 247.
61. Ronksley-Pavia, M., Barton, G. M., & Pendergast, D. (2019). Multiage education: An exploration of advantages and disadvantages through a systematic review of the literature. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 44(5), 24-41.
62. Russell, V. J., Rowe, K. J., & Hill, P. W. (1998). Effects of Multigrade Classes on Student Progress in Literacy and Numeracy: Quantitative Evidence and Perceptions of Teachers and School Leaders.
63. Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(5), 749.
64. Sewasew, D., & Schroeders, U. (2019). The developmental interplay of academic self-concept and achievement within and across domains among primary school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 204-212.
65. Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of educational research, 46(3), 407-441.
66. Guo, S. & Fraser, M. W. (2015). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Sage Publications.
67. Spinath, B. (2004). Determinanten von Fähigkeitsselbstwahrnehmungen im Grundschulalter. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 36(2), 63-68.
68. Veenman, S. (1996). Effects of multigrade and multi-age classes reconsidered. Review of educational research, 66(3), 323-340.
69. Veenman, S. (1995). Cognitive and noncognitive effects of multigrade and multi-age classes: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of educational research, 65(4), 319-381.
70. Veenman, S. (1997). Combination classrooms revisited. Educational Research and Evaluation, 3(3), 262-276.
71. Wickham, H., Chang, W., & Wickham, M. H. (2016). Package ‘ggplot2’. Create elegant data visualisations using the grammar of graphics. Version, 2(1), 1-189.
72. Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Achievement motivation. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology, 1-2.
73. Wolff, F., Helm, F., Zimmermann, F., Nagy, G., & Möller, J. (2018). On the effects of social, temporal, and dimensional comparisons on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(7), 1005.
74. Wolff, F., Nagy, G., Retelsdorf, J., Helm, F., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2019). The 2I/E model: Integrating temporal comparisons into the internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(7), 1131.

Keywords

multi-grad, multi-age, stage classes, development, self-concept

Affiliations