Latent Profile Analysis: Comparison of Achievement versus Ability-Derived Subgroups of Mathematical Skills
Keywords:
Mathematical Skills, Ability Assessment, Achievement Assessment, Latent Profile Analysis, CogATAbstract
This study compared latent profiles derived from student subgroups of varying levels of mathematical skills defined by achievement and ability assessment scores. Achievement and ability cut scores for identifying students at both ends of the mathematics spectrum were applied and the resulting latent profiles within each condition were compared. The research utilized latent profile analysis to identify student profiles with achievement scores from the Iowa Assessments and ability scores from CogAT. The participants consisted of 50,998 second-grade students in a Southeastern state. The finding revealed varying demographics and patterns of ability and achievement for each condition, underscoring the need to acknowledge students with diverse learning styles and the distinct dynamics between achievement and ability scores to use for identifying students who may benefit from tailored educational programs.
Downloads
References
Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723.
Akogul, S., & Erisoglu, M. (2017). An Approach for Determining the Number of Clusters in a Model-Based Cluster Analysis. Entropy, 19(9), 452. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e19090452.
Banfield, J.D., & Raftery, A.E (1993). Model-based Gaussian and non-Gaussian clustering. Biometrics, 49, 803–821.
Biernacki, C., & Govaert, G. (1997). Using the classification likelihood to choose the number of clusters. Computing Science and Statistics, 29, 451–457.
Carriedo, N., Rodríguez-Villagra, O. A., Pérez, L., & Iglesias-Sarmiento, V. (2024). Executive functioning profiles and mathematical and reading achievement in Grades 2, 6, and 10. Journal of School Psychology, 106, 101353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101353
Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1–22.
Cattell, R. B. (1987). Intelligence: Its structure, growth, and action. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Cavanaugh, J. E. (1999). A large-sample model selection criterion based on Kullback's symmetric divergence. Statistics & Probability Letters, 42(4), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7152(98)00200-4.
Curriculum Associates, LLC. (2020). Understanding Student Needs: Early Results from Fall Assessments. Curriculum Associates Research Report No. 2020-40. North Billerica, MA: Author.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Cook-Harvey, C. M. (2018). Educating the whole child: Improving school climate to support student success. Retrieved from Learning Policy Institute https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/media/547/download?inline&file=Educating_Whole_Child_REPORT.pdf
Dunbar, S. B., & Welch, C. J. (2015). Iowa Assessments, Form E. Riverside Insights: Itasca, IL.
Green, C. T., Bunge, S. A., Chiongbian, V. B., Barrow, M., & Ferrer, E. (2017). Fluid reasoning predicts future mathematical performance among children and adolescents. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 157, 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.12.005
Hwang, J., Hand, B., & French, B. F. (2023). Critical thinking skills and science achievement: A latent profile analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101349
Kuhfeld, M., Tarasawa, B., Johnson, A., Ruzek, E., & Lewis, K. (2020). Learning during COVID-19: initial findings on students’ reading and math achievement and growth. NWEA.
Laursen, B., & Hoff, E. (2006). Person-centered and variable-centered approaches to longitudinal data. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (1982-), 377–389.
Lubke, G., & Neale, M. C. (2006). Distinguishing Between Latent Classes and Continuous Factors: Resolution by Maximum Likelihood? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(4), 499–532. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4104_4.
Lohman, D. F. (2013) CogAT Form 7 Score Interpretation Guide: Part 3 Adapting Instruction to Student’s Needs and Abilities. Riverside Insights.
Lohman, D. F., & Lakin, J. M. (2017). Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT), Form 7. Riverside Insights.
Litkowski, E. C., Finders, J. K., Borriello, G. A., Purpura, D. J., & Schmitt, S. A. (2020). Patterns of heterogeneity in kindergarten children's executive function: Profile associations with third grade achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 80, 101846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101846
Mahatmya, D., Assouline, S., Foley-Nicpon, M., Ali, S. R., McGinnis, D., & Teriba, A. (2023). Patterns of high ability and underrepresented students’ subject-specific psychosocial strengths: A latent profile analysis. High Ability Studies, 34(2), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2023.2176293
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person-and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(2), 191–225.
McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471721182
Morin, A., Meyer, J., Creusier, J., & Biétry, F. (2016). Multiple-group analysis of similarity in latent profile solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 19(2), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115621148
Moses, R. P., & Cobb, C. E. Jr., (2001). Radical equations: Civil rights from Mississippi to the Algebra Project. Boston: Beacon
National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). NAEP, Reading Report Card for the Nation and the States. U.S. Department of Education.
Nickerson, R. (2011). Developing intelligence through instruction. In R. J. Sternberg, & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 107–129). New York: Cambridge University Press.
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
Renaissance Learning (2021). How kids are performing: Tracking the school-year impact of COVID-19 on reading and mathematics achievement. Special Report Series, Spring 2021 edition.
Riverside Insights. (2012). Forms E and F Score Interpretation Guide. Itasca, IL: The University of Iowa (Iowa Testing Program).
Rosenberg, J. M., van Lissa, C. J., Beymer, P. N., Anderson, D. J., Schell, M. J. & Schmidt, J. A.
(2019). tidyLPA: Easily carry out Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) using open-source or
commercial software [R package]. https://data-edu.github.io/tidyLPA/
Schneider, W. (2013). Principles of assessment of aptitude and achievement. In D. H. Saklofske, V. L. Schwean, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of child psychological assessment (pp. 286–330). New York: Oxford
Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464.
Soares, D. L., Lemos, G. C., Primi, R., & Almeida, L. S. (2015). The relationship between intelligence and academic achievement throughout middle school: The role of students' prior academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 41, 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.02.005
Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., Wang, M., Valero, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445
Younger, J. W., Schaerlaeken, S., Anguera, J. A., & Gazzaley, A. (2024). The whole is greater than the sum of its parts: Using cognitive profiles to predict academic achievement. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 36, 100237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2024.100237
