Towards an Empowering Education in Morocco: Primary School Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices and Implementation Challenges
Keywords:
Learner Autonomy, Empowering Education, Pedagogical Practices, Implementation ChallengesAbstract
Learner autonomy, considered an essential transversal skill, is supported by various pedagogical practices. This study aims to identify the pedagogical practices that promote learner autonomy in Moroccan primary education and examine the reasons behind their adoption. Adopting a mixed-methods approach, the study involved a sample of 258 primary school teachers from three Moroccan regions. Quantitative data, collected through a five-point Likert scale questionnaire, were analyzed using descriptive analysis and non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-hoc tests. Qualitative data, obtained from semi-structured interviews with a sub-sample of teachers, underwent thematic analysis. The results reveal highly uneven adoption of autonomy-supportive practices. Exploratory learning and adaptive support are relatively well-integrated, while self-directed digital learning and learner involvement in educational decisions remain marginal. Further analysis shows significant differences between these practices (p < 0.05), suggesting a preference among teachers for structured approaches over learner-centered autonomy strategies. The study also highlights several major barriers, including insufficient professional training, limited institutional support, inequalities in access to digital resources, and a school culture still largely focused on academic performance. These factors hinder the adoption of autonomy-supportive practices, particularly digital self-learning and active student participation in educational choices. These findings underscore the need for systemic reforms to enhance the integration of autonomy-promoting teaching practices. It is recommended to strengthen continuous teacher training, with a particular emphasis on digital tools and participatory methodologies. Furthermore, reducing inequalities in access to digital resources is essential to ensure equitable learning opportunities for all students.
Downloads
References
Alzahrani, K. S. (2022). “Away from the textbook,” metacognitive strategies in mathematics: A qualitative study on Saudi students’ motivation to learn mathematics, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11507
Amadieu, F., & Tricot, A. (2014). Technologies et apprentissage autonome. Revue Des Sciences de l’Éducation, 34, 123–145.
Basri, F. (2020). Factors influencing learner autonomy and autonomy support in a faculty of education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(2), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1798921
Bruner, W. J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). Le rôle de l’étayage dans l’apprentissage. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.1976.tb00315.x
Çini, A., Malmberg, J., & Järvelä, S. (2023). How individual metacognitive awareness relates to situation-specific metacognitive interpretations of collaborative learning tasks. Educational Studies, 49(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1834359
Day, C. (2020). How teachers’ individual autonomy may hinder students’ academic progress and attainment: Professionalism in practice. British Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3577
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Engler, L., & Westphal, A. (2024). Teacher autonomy support counters declining trend in intrinsic reading motivation across secondary school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39, 4047–4065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00842-5
Esfandiari, M., & Gawhary, M. W. (2019). Is technology paving the way for autonomous learning? World Journal of English Language, 9(2), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v9n2p64
Figueroa-Vargas, A., & Casillas-Martín, S. (2024). Innovation in teacher training: Curricular and operational keys in pedagogy programs. Sustainability, 16(20), 8966. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208966
Freitas, Y. A., Abbasi, M., Brito-Costa, S., Pinto, R., Rato, V., & Martins, F. (2024). Exploratory teaching: Integrating applet to teach arithmetic multiplication operation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(12), em2546. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15666
Hampton, L. H., & Chow, J. C. (2022). Deeply tailoring adaptive interventions: Enhancing knowledge generation of SMARTs in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 43(3), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325211030669
Harms, M. B., Xu, Y., Green, C. S., Woodard, K., Wilson, R., & Pollak, S. D. (2024). The structure and development of explore-exploit decision making. Cognitive Psychology, 150, 101650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2024.101650
Hoffmans-Gosset, H. (1994). Apprendre l’autonomie, apprendre la socialisation. Éditions du CNDP.
Howard, J. L., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J. X. Y., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789
Kallio E. L., Öhman, H., Hietanen, M., Soini, H., Strandberg, T. E., Kautiainen, H., & Pitkälä, K. H. (2028). Effects of cognitive training on cognition and quality of life of older persons with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc., 66(4), 664-670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15196
Karimi-Aghdam, S. (2017). Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) as an emergent system: A dynamic systems theory perspective. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9359-1
Khosravisadeh, O. (2014). Analysis of the impact of Vigotsky’s collaborative learning theory on the development of group skills. Journal of Study and Innovation in Education and Development, 3(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.61838/jsied.3.1.1
Kinsella, M., Wyatt, J., Nestor, N., Last, J., & Rackard, S. (2023). Fostering students’ autonomy within higher education: the relational roots of student adviser supports. Irish Educational Studies, 43(4), 1189–1208. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2201229
Lengkanawati, N. (2017). Learner autonomy in the Indonesian EFL settings. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 222-231. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v6i2.4847
Little, D. J. H. (1991). Autonomy in Language Learning. Language Teaching Research, 5(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889100500203
Ministère de l’Éducation Nationale. (2015). Vision stratégique pour la réforme de l’éducation 2015-2030.
Musa, S., & Nurhayati, S. (2024). Educators’ resilience amidst digital era challenges: Case study in Indonesia. Journal of Electrical Systems, 20(4s), 832–840. https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.2121
Musa, S., Nurhayati, S., Jabar, R., Sulaimawan, D., & Fauziddin, M. (2022). Upaya dan tantangan kepala sekolah PAUD dalam mengembangkan lembaga dan memotivasi guru untuk mengikuti program sekolah penggerak. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(5), 4239–4254. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i5.2624
Musa, S., Suherman, A. M., Sujarwo, S., & Nurhayati, S. (2024). Continuous professional growth: A study of educators’ commitment to lifelong learning. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 43(2), 502–512. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v43i2.66654
Mykhalchuk, N., & Onufriyeva, L. (2020). Psychological principles of student sovereignty. Collection of Scientific Papers "Problems of Modern Psychology" , (49), 244–268. https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2020-49.244-268
Nayak, K. V., & Alam, S. (2022). The digital divide, gender and education: Challenges for tribal youth in rural Jharkhand during Covid-19. Decision, 49(2), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-022-00315-y
Noor, A. H., & Nurhayati, S. (2023). Project-Based learning implementation in a participative planning course: Strategies, outcomes, and challenges. Cahaya Pendidikan, 9(2), 164–172.
Nurhayati, S., Fitri, A., Amir, R., & Zalisman, Z. (2024). Analysis of the implementation of training on digital-based learning media to enhance teachers’ digital literacy. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(1), 545–557. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i1.4029
Poom-Valickis, K., Eisenschmidt, E., & Leppiman, A. (2022). Creating and developing a collaborative and learning-centred school culture: Views of Estonian school leaders. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 22(2), 217-237. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1029
Sener, M. I., Nagai, Y., Oztop, E., & Ugur, E. (2023). Exploration with intrinsic motivation using object–action–outcome latent space. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 15(2), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2021.3062728
Sharma, K., Nguyen, A., & Hong, Y. (2024). Self‐regulation and shared regulation in collaborative learning in adaptive digital learning environments: A systematic review of empirical studies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4), 1398–1436. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13459
Shin, M., & Bolkan, S. (2020). Intellectually stimulating students’ intrinsic motivation: The mediating influence of student engagement, self-efficacy, and student academic support. Communication Education, 70(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1828959
Silseth, K., & Erstad, O. (2022). Exploring opportunities, complexities, and tensions when invoking students’ everyday experiences as resources in educational activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, 103633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103633
Stanton, J. D., Sebesta, A. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2021). Fostering metacognition to supportstudent learning and performance. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289
Susanti, M., & Nurhayati, S. (2024). Exploring digital literacy usage for self-directed learning: Rural adolescents’ perspectives. Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan, 16(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26418/jvip.v16i1.67216
Suwartono. (2014). Dasar dasar metodologi penelitian. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
Tangney, B., Girvan, C., Ní Chorcora, E., & Bray, A. (2023). Overcoming barriers to teaching 21C skills: The bridge21 approach. Irish Educational Studies, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2270564
Tuononen, T., Hyytinen, H., Kleemola, K., Hailikari, T., & Toom, A. (2023). Generic skills in higher education – teachers’ conceptions, pedagogical practices and pedagogical training. Teaching in Higher Education, 30(1), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2248003
Vygotski, L. S. (1934). Pensée et langage (1997th ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Werdiningsih, W., Al-Rashidi, A. H., & Azami, M. I. (2022). The development of metacognitive models to support students' autonomous learning: Lessons from Indonesian primary schools.
Winarti, W., Nurhayati, S., Rukanda, N., Musa, S., Jabar, R., & Rohaeti, E. E. (2022). analisis kompetensi digital guru PAUD dalam mengelola pembelajaran daring anak usia dini. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(6), 5621–5629. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i6.3111
Yonezawa, T., & Nakai, Y. (2024). ICT self-efficacy, self-efficacy for teamwork, and collegial collaborations: An exploratory study of elementary school teachers’ ICT uses in inquiry-based learning in Japan. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1410886
Yuliani, Y., & Lengkanawati, N. (2017). Project-based learning in promoting learner autonomy in an EFL classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 285-293. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8131
Zabaleta, O. E., & Pérez-Izaguirre, E. (2022). The development of student autonomy in Spain over the last 10 years: A review. Educational Review, 75(7), 1329–1348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1987389
