Main Article Content
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the type and accuracy of the visual representations that the pre-service teachers generate in the pedagogical solution of the word problems in terms of the spatial skill levels of the pre-service teachers. It is designed as a descriptive study in the screening model in accordance with the purpose of the study. The research was carried out in 2017 with 55 pre-service teachers attending the Primary School Teacher Education programme at Ordu University. The data on participants' spatial competence levels were obtained through Purdue Spatial Visualization Test and on the type of visual representations were obtained by coding the data obtained from the solution of a word problem given to the participants according to the criteria specified by the researchers. In the analysis of the data, descriptive analysis and content analysis were applied. As a result of the research, the visual representation types (schematic and pictorial) generated by the pre-service teachers have been determined and it was found that the pre-service teachers with high spatial ability generated correctly structured schematic representations; whereas candidates with low spatial skills usually generated pictorial representations.
Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics 52, 215–241.
Baki A. & Güven B. (2007). Dinamik Geometri Yazılımı Cabri 3D’nin Öğretmen Adaylarının Uzamsal Yetenekleri Üzerine Etkisi, The Proceedings of 7th International Educational Technology Conference. Near East University, Turkish Republic of North Cyprus.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Boonen, A. J. H., Van der Schoot, M., Van Wesel, F., De Vries, M. & Jolles, J. (2013). What underlies successful word problem solving? A path analysis in sixth grade children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 271-279.
Boonen, A. J. H., Van Wesel, F., Jolles, J. & van der Schoot, M. (2014). The role of visual representation type, spatial ability, and reading comprehension in word problem solving: An item-level analysis in elementary school children. International Journal of Educational Research, 68, 15-26.
Boonen, A., Reed, H., Schoonenboom, J. & Jolles, J. (2016). It’s not a math lesson-we’re learning to draw! Teachers’ use of visual representations in instructing word problem solving in sixth grade of elementary school. Frontline Learning Research, 4(5), 34-61.
Guay, R. B. (1977). Purdue Spatial Visualization Test-Visualization of Rotations. W.Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation.
Güven, B. & Kösa, T. (2008). The effect of dynamic geometry software on student mathematics teachers’ spatial visualization skills. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4), 100-107.
Haciomeroglu, S. E. (2007). Calculus students’ undersatanding of derivative graphs: Problems of representations in calculus. Unpublished PhD Thesis, The Florida State University.
Hegarty, M. & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 684-689.
Jitendra, A. (2002). Teaching students math problem-solving through graphic representations. Teaching exceptional children, 34(4), 34-38.
Jitendra, A. K., Rodriguez, M., Kanive, R., Huang, J., Church, C., Corroy, K. A. & Zaslofsky, A. (2013). Impact of small-group tutoring interventions on the mathematical problem solving and achievement of third-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Learning disability quarterly, 36(1), 21-35.
Kahney, H. (1993). Problem Solving: Current Issues. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Yirminci Basım. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Krawec, J. L. (2010). Problem representation and mathematical problem solving of students with varying abilities (PhD Thesis, University of Miami). Miami.
Linn, M. C. & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child development, 1479-1498.
Mayer, R. E. (1985). Mathematical ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: An information processing approach (pp. 127-150). San Francisco: Freeman.
Mayer, R E (1992) Thinking, problem solving, cognition. WH Freeman.
Montague, M. (2003). Solve It! A practical approach to teaching mathematical problem solving skills. VA: Exceptional Innovations, Inc.
Montague, M., Warger, C. & Morgan, T. H. (2000). Solve it! Strategy instruction to improve mathematical problem solving. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice. 15(2), 110-116.
Pape, S. & Tchoshanov, M. (2001). The role of representation(s) in developing mathematical understanding. Theory into Practice, 40(2), 118-127.
Uesaka, Y., Manalo, E. & Ichikawa, S. I. (2007). What kinds of perceptions and daily learning behaviors promote students' use of diagrams in mathematics problem solving? Learning and Instruction, 17(3), 322-335.
Sevimli, E. (2009). Matematik Öğretmen Adaylarının Belirli İntegral Konusundaki Temsil Tercihlerinin Uzamsal Yetenek ve Akademik Başarı Bağlamında İncelenmesi. Master Thesis, Istanbul, Turkey.
Uygan, C. (2011). Katı Cisimlerin Öğretiminde Google Sketchup ve Somut Model Destekli Uygulamaların İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmeni Adaylarının Uzamsal Yeteneklerine Etkisi. Unpublished Master Thesis, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
van Garderen, D. (2006). Spatial visualization, visual imagery, and mathematical problem solving of students with varying abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 496–506.
van Garderen, D. & Montague, M. (2003). Visual–spatial representation, mathematical problem solving, and students of varying abilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 246–254.
van Essen, G. & Hamaker, C. (1990). Using self-generated drawings to solve arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Research, 83(6), 301-312.
Yancey, A. V., Thompson, C. S. & Yancey, J. S. (1989). Children must learn to draw diagrams. Arithmetic Teacher, 36(7), 15-23.