Main Article Content
When students have the freedom to use digital media to create, communicate and disseminate messages, transgression occurs. In this paper, I situate in-school youth production in the context of pedagogical theories of participatory culture, art education, and digital and media literacy education. Using interviews with four experienced high school media production educators, I examine how educators perceive school situations where behavior or student media work products disrupt or transgress expectations. Teachers experience student transgression as an essential dimension of the dialectic between creative freedom and creative control. They perceive creative control to be a negotiation between students and teachers on issues of content, format, production and distribution processes. Teachers conceptualize the distinctions between students who use transgression as a form expressive creativity, a reproduction of the tropes of mass media and popular culture, the result of novices making mistakes as part of learning, an attempt to gain social power and status among their peers, or a challenge to adult authority. Teacher reflection on creative control and creative freedom may inform the design of media production learning experiences.
Bach, A. (2010). Youth media literacy practices: The possibilities and complexities of creating and distributing non-commercial public media in a private and commercial world. Dissertation. University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education.
Batra, N. (2013). The first freedoms and America’s culture of innovation. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlejohn.
Bennett, W. L. (2008). Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth. MIT Press.
Bhaskar, R., (1975 ), A realist theory of science. 2nd edition. London, Verso.
Buckingham, D. (2013). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. London: Polity Press.
Buckingham, David. Teaching popular culture: Beyond radical pedagogy. Psychology Press, 1998.
Buckingham, D., & Sefton-Green, J. (1994). Cultural studies goes to school: Reading and teaching popular media. London: Taylor & Francis.
Buckingham, D., Banaji, S., Burn, A., Carr, D., Cranmer, S., & Willett, R. (2005). The media literacy of children and young people: A review of the research literature on behalf of Ofcom. Retrieved June 11, 2006, from http://www.ofcom.org.uk/advice/media_literacy/medlitpub/medlitpubrss/ml_children.pdf
Buckingham, D., & Willett R. (2013). Digital generations: Children, young people, and the new media. New York: Routledge.
Darts, D. (2004). Visual culture jam: Art, pedagogy, and creative resistance. Studies in Art Education, 45(4), 313-327.
Darts, D. (2006). Head game$: Engaging popular vi$ual culture. In P. Duncum (Ed.), Visual culture in the art class: Case studies (pp. 99-198). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
Duncum, P. (2009). Toward a playful pedagogy: Popular culture and the pleasures of transgression. Studies in Art Education, 232-244.
Duncum, P. (2007). What we are learning about teaching popular visual culture. In M. A. Park (Ed.), Art education as critical cultural inquiry (pp. 216-233). Seoul, Korea: Mijlnsa.
Edwards, R. & Holland, J. 2013. What is qualitative interviewing? New York: Bloomsbury.
Goodman, S. (2003). Teaching youth media: A critical guide to literacy, video production & social change. New York: Teachers College.
Halverson, E. R., Lowenhaupt, R., Gibbons, D., & Bass, M. (2009). Conceptualizing identity in youth media arts organizations: A comparative case study. E-Learning and Digital Media, 6(1), 23-42.
Hines, M., Kersulov, M., Rowland, L. & Rupert, R. 2014. Composing texts and identities in an alternative high school English class. In R. Anderson, Ed. Handbook of Research on Digital Tools for Writing Instruction in K-12 Settings (479 – 498). New York: IGI .
Huizinga, J., Hull, R., & Carrington F. (1949). Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Translated by RFC Hull. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hrabowski, F. & Sanders, M. (2015). Increasing teacher diversity in the teacher workforce: One university’s approach. Thought and Action, Winter, 101 – 116.
Ito, Mizuko, et al. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
Ito, M., et al. (2009). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge: MIT.
Ivashkevich, O. , & Shoppell, S. (2013). Appropriation, parody, gender play and self -representation in preadolescents’ digital video production. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 134(2), 1-24.
Jenkins, H., et al. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Kenway, J., & Bullen, E. (2001). Consuming children: Education, entertainment, advertising. London: Open University Press.
Lange, P. G. (2014). Kids on YouTube: Technical identities and digital literacies. Left Coast Press.
Marsh, J. (2005). Popular culture, new media and digital literacy in early childhood. New York: Psychology Press.
Masterman, L. (1985). Teaching the media. New York: Routledge.
Saxton, B. N. (2007). The Media Production Experience: a Phenomenological Study of Student Media Production in a Secondary Education Environment. Brigham Young University, MA thesis, paper 1014. Retrived from http://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2013&context=etd
Tripp, L. M. and Herr-Stephenson, R. (2009), Making access meaningful: Latino young people using digital media at home and at school. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14: 1190–1207. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01486.x
Tyner, K. (2009). Media literacy: New agendas in communication. New York: Routledge.
Young, J. S. (2012). Linking learning: Connecting traditional and media literacies in 21st century learning. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 4(1), 70-81.